<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>notes by philip hackney</title>
    <link>http://phck.net/everything/#blog</link>
    <description>notes by philip hackney</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="http://phck.net/post/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>The edgewise subdivision criterion</title>
      <link>http://phck.net/post/edgewise.html</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>http://phck.net/post/edgewise.html</guid>
      <description>In which I ask an LLM to generalize the Bergner–Osorno–Ozornova–Rovelli–Scheimbauer characterization of 2-Segal objects in terms of edgewise subdivision. Spoiler: it does a good job.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Spheres as d-Segal sets</title>
      <link>http://phck.net/post/spheres.html</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>http://phck.net/post/spheres.html</guid>
      <description>We explain two results. Theorem: For n≥1, Δⁿ/∂Δⁿ is 2n-Segal, but not lower (2n−1)-Segal. If n≥2, then it is upper (2n−1)-Segal if and only if n is odd. Theorem: For n≥1, ∂Δⁿ⁺¹ is (n+1)-Segal but neither upper nor lower n-Segal.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Against active-inert pushouts</title>
      <link>http://phck.net/post/against-active-inert.html</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>http://phck.net/post/against-active-inert.html</guid>
      <description>Naively, one might hope that, for any algebraic copattern, presheaves which send active-inert pushout squares to pullbacks might be a good notion of generalized decomposition space. We push back on this a bit with some pointed examples, including one related to double categories.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>2-Segal spaces and ΔS</title>
      <link>http://phck.net/post/2-segal-spaces-and-delta-s.html</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>http://phck.net/post/2-segal-spaces-and-delta-s.html</guid>
      <description>For ΔS presheaves, there is no difference between the Segal and the 2-Segal conditions.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Question</title>
      <link>http://phck.net/post/cfgmc_question.html</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>http://phck.net/post/cfgmc_question.html</guid>
      <description>We present a statement about whether certain full subcategories of (cofibrantly generated) model categories inherit a model structure. The question is about situations where it applies, and there are a couple updates based on comments from Patchkoria and Riehl; later we learned this theorem is due to Intermont–Johnson.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
